Nothing will be the same, and that means that international community, West before the others, faces consequences for which it is not prepared.

Bombing caused enormous loses on economy and infrastructure of Serbia and Yugoslavia but NATO suffered political defeat. Not only that aggression on Yugoslavia led to humanitarian disaster, but it also endangered western strategically interests.

Global interests of West and NATO were based, as secretary general Javier Solana recently said, on stable relationship and partnership with Russia and China as global powers. Solana stressed that political future of NATO and western community which this alliance represents stood precisely in that. And this strategical relationship ceased to exist.

Relations with Russia, it was admitted in British diplomatic circles, virtually don't exist and visit of Victor Chernomyrdin is observed like a chance for certain restoration. But regardless of that mission which would be of some help, what was already lost is too much to be restored soon.

After bombing of Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, particularly because background of the attack becomes more and more clear, strategic partnership with China has been completely changed.

Many experts estimate that economic ties between West and China are too considerable and serious to come into perspective to be endangered, but Peking is the one who makes rules now, not western "partners".

Background of attack on the embassy unveiled relations inside NATO. The embassy was American, not NATO target.

Regardless of all endeavors to keep this topic hidden, it is clear that NATO members, perhaps save Great Britain, did not in fact know that the embassy was a target. And it really was a target. American plane from American strategic forces, which are not under command of NATO, bombed it. And all that means that NATO is nothing but instrument of American policy.

Now they try to blame American Central Information Agency (CIA) and some "double agent". Regardless how naïve and transparent this manipulation is it uncovers another, more important problem. Is it possible that eighteen NATO countries are just an instrument of intelligence agency known for its "historical heritage" of violence and lies? It is clear to everybody that Chinese embassy was intentionally targeted, because of American political interest.

Does NATO, under such circumstances, has any future? New European Commissioner Romano Prodi clearly stated yesterday that European Union had to have its own military power, without Unites States. USA are the most powerful and the most rich country but, experts notice, it is not the only and alone in this world.

From that point of view experts also estimate German demand for immediate investigation of circumstances in which attack on Chinese embassy, in which three people were killed and twenty wounded, could happen. German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder had five days visit to China in his schedule. It was supposed to be great promotion of Germany and its economy, so group of the most influential businessmen was also on the list of travelers.

But, Peking sent a massage that Schroeder can come and stay for 24 hours.

This is humiliation that Germany has to swallow, but what is next? What will US president Bill Clinton tell to American businessmen who invested many and many billion dollars in China. British prime minister Tony Blair to British, too?

Britain, thanks to historical experience it has, intends to be one of bridges of strategic relationship with Peking.

Arrogance that NATO shows is a warning first to its own members. These are facts of embarrassing reality which brings obvious fears that aggression on Yugoslavia is a beginning of uncertain future of relations in world. Fears are growing because bitterness that defeat brings great inspiration for vanity of those who are mighty so "spiral of lunatic" might bring new disasters and human suffering.