USA hit Chinese embassy on purpose

London, 9th May (Tanjug) - Confusion around the explanation how the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade happened to be bombarded arises serious doubts in motives and background of this tragic event, notice British annalists today.

Totally unconvincing explanation offered by Brussels arose doubts that bombarding of the Chinese Embassy has no direct connection with NATO as a whole, but with American administration which attempts to utilize growing tension with China for its local political purpose.

In that sense, analysts also doubt that three missiles fired at the Embassy were not a "catastrophic mistake" as officially stated, but a pure intention. According to their estimates the Embassy was purposely targeted.

Namely, the "Sunday Times" of London points out that lethal missiles, it looks like, were launched by American bombardier B2. In the first NATO statement it was told that the Embassy had been hit by mistake and that the actual target had been the other building in its vicinity. In a special statement later on it was told that it was not the pilot's mistake but the Embassy was, allegedly by mistake, put in the target list.

Some specialists for these issues, however, believe that the attack on the Embassy has practically discovered the existence of a special plan in the aggression on Yugoslavia, carried only by the U.S.A. with aims different than those proclaimed by NATO command.

The fact is that the bombarding was committed by special units of the American strategic aviation, which is not subordinated to NATO and which landed off from the American territory could only support these assumptions.

Later on in London was launched a story that the real aim was "Yugoslavia" hotel, hit the same night. In NATO head-quarter at the same time it was told that the target had been the "command of military forces", but it was not precisely told which command was in question.

All that was followed by statements from Pentagon and NATO that the bombarding the Chinese Embassy was the consequence of "wrong information of spies from Belgrade", according to which the Embassy building was storage of weapons and ammunition. Obviously they tried to cast over their guilty to spy network and thus they say that the information was maybe received from "a double spy".

As much as NATO is arrogant and unscrupulous in its lies, so much it is "naïve" in underestimation of the publicity. Does anybody in pentagon or Brussels really think that people could believe that London or Washington do not know where is the new building of the Chinese Embassy?

It could be concluded that the main perpetrator is American CIA, what many British analysts are convinced in as they do not believe that the Embassy was bombarded due to wrong information of "poor agent" in the field, but due to special plans of CIA which practically misuses NATO.

The London's "Sunday Times" recalls that some days ago full competence for target choosing was given to American General Westley Clark and thus he is the only one who knows "the real truth". It simultaneously means that the NATO Chief Commander is directly responsible. Hence, CIA and Clark are main traces in the expected investigation.